Pharox LED Bulb Is Energy Efficient, And Lasts 35 Years
The Pharox LED Bulb will be a little bit on an investment in the beginning, but will definitely pay for itself with its energy efficiency, and lifespan.
The Pharox LED Lamp uses up to 90% less energy than an incandescent bulb, and Can replace up to a 40 Watt incandescent bulb with the same amount of light intensity.
The Pharox lasts 50 times longer with a lifetime of 50,000 hours lifetime, compared to 1000 hours of a standard incandescent bulb.
By introducing revolutionary LED technology to the market, Lemnis is empowering consumers, influencers and business partners world over to actively take on climate change through highly efficient lighting technology. Lighting can be attributed to 19% of total worldwide energy consumption and it is our mission to reduce this consumption through the use of our products.
December 8th, 2007 15:27
35 years … ?
wow, awesome
December 20th, 2007 14:01
Well, isn’t that nice? How about Nikola Tesla’s light bulbs, which were had their chance in the commercial markets? It is said that those light bulbs could have lasted even more, but they never reached the production line because they were not profitable, since you only need to buy them once in your lifetime…
December 20th, 2007 17:07
Tesla was a great inventor, but I don’t believe that there is any conspiracy that could successfully hide any of his good inventions this long. It’s possible that he made a light bulb but as you say, it has to be economical to make and to operate. Todays fluorescents and the new LED lamps are getting very efficient to operate.
December 20th, 2007 20:39
Hello,
The correct link for this light bulb is this one:
http://upscalelighting.com/showProduct.php?on=Pharox
Thanks!
January 1st, 2008 23:45
Wow, that’s a cool little lightbulb.
I do wander what kind of lighting we’ll be using 50,000 ‘working’ hours from now though…
(I’ve got a feeling these little fellows will be obsolete before they die their natural death and we’ll have some kind of new nano lighting or something)
April 16th, 2008 15:25
These are great, however, if they were 60 bucks, now 39, probably should be 15 dollars.